5 found
Order:
  1.  29
    Psychophysical scaling within an information processing approach?Claude Bonnet - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):560-561.
  2. Psychophysical evidence for low-level processing of illusory contours and surfaces in the Kanizsa square.Birgitta Dresp & Claude Bonnet - 1991 - Vision Research 31:1813-1817.
    Light increment thresholds were measured on either side of one of the illusory contours of a white-on-black Kanizsa square and on the illusory contour itself. The data show that thresholds are elevated when measured on either side of the illusory border. These elevations diminish with increasing distance of the target spot from the white elements which induce the illusory figure. The most striking result, however, is that threshold elevations are considerably lower or even absent when the target is located on (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. Psychophysical measures of illusory form: Further evidence for local mechanisms.Birgitta Dresp & Claude Bonnet - 1993 - Vision Research 33:759-766.
    Detection thresholds for a small light spot were measured at various distances from the colinear inucer edges of white inducing elements on a dark background. The data show that thresholds are elevated when the target is located close to one or more inducing element(s). Threshold elevations diminish with increasing distance of the target from colinear edges and decreasing surface size of the inducing elements. gradients show the same tendencies. Tbe present observations add empirical support to the idea that illusory figures (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  13
    Reaction time and visual area: Searching for the determinants.Claude Bonnet, Jorge Gurlekian & Paula Harris - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (5):396-398.
  5.  26
    Only stimulus energy affects the detectability of visual forms and objects.Muriel Boucart & Claude Bonnet - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):415-417.
    A detection task was performed using different pictographic representations of objects in order to test the hypothesis that high-level information (familiarity) may influence detection thresholds. The stimuli were five versions of forms: outline drawings of objects, silhouettes, and three fragmented versions of forms derived from the outlines. The stimuli varied on two parameters: their nameability (easily nameable, hardly nameable, and not nameable) as assessed by a naming task, and their energy content as assessed by a two-dimensional fast-Fourier transform. The greatest (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation