- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Results for ' differential eyelid conditioning'
999 found
Order:
- Differential eyelid conditioning based on opposing instrumental contingencies.Suzanne E. Kwaterski & John W. Moore - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):547.
- Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval.Thomas F. Hartman & David A. Grant - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):131.
- Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
- Differential eyelid conditioning: Establishing differential responding prior to varying the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman & Julian Woodhouse - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):146.
- Differential eyelid conditioning to verbal stimuli varying in formal similarity.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):9.
- Differential eyelid conditioning under equated drive as a function of the reinforcing UCS.Kenneth W. Spence & Blaine F. Tandler - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):35.
- Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of stimulus similarity and strength of response to the CS.Malcolm D. Gynther - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (6):408.
- Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement.Frederick L. Newman - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):412.
- Differential eyelid conditioning: The generalization of reinforcement and of nonreinforcement.Frederick L. Newman, James C. Francis, Alice West & Diane Covey - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (6):433-436.
- Instructional sets in human differential eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy & Charles K. Allen - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):271.
- Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning: Effects of semantic and formal features of verbal stimuli.Michael J. Zajano, David A. Grant & Marian Schwartz - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1147.
- Transfer of differential eyelid conditioning through successive discriminations.David A. Grant, C. Michael Levy, Johanna Thompson, Craig W. Hickok & Dennis C. Bunde - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):246.
- Separate-phase differential eyelid conditioning within the context of a masking procedure.M. J. Homzie - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (4p1):630.
- Response topography in the acquisition of differential eyelid conditioning.Michael J. Zajano & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (6):1115.
- Cardiac orienting during "good" and "poor" differential eyelid conditioning.Lois E. Putnam, Leonard E. Ross & Frances K. Graham - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):563.
- Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
- Truth and falsity of verbal statements as conditioned stimuli in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):178.
- Effects of masking tasks on differential eyelid conditioning: A distinction between knowledge of stimulus contingencies and attentional or cognitive activities involving them.Michael N. Nelson & Leonard E. Ross - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (1):1.
- The relation of anxiety to differential eyelid conditioning.Kenneth W. Spence & I. E. Farber - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (2):127.
- Arithmetic correctness as the discriminandum in classical and differential eyelid conditioning.Robert A. Fleming, David A. Grant & Jane A. North - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):286.
- Differential rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of age, interstimulus interval, and cue similarity.Peter W. Frey - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):326.
- Verbal discrimination learning theory and differential eyelid conditioning to related words at three interstimulus intervals.Louise C. Perry - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):299-302.
- Differential human eyelid conditioning as a function of the probability of reinforcement and CS similarity.Gail B. Peterson & Frederick L. Newman - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):318.
- Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
- Differential classical and avoidance eyelid conditioning.Dominic W. Massaro & John W. Moore - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (2):151.
- Intrastimulus conflict in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):428-430.
- Subject awareness in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):431-432.
- Hemispheric processing in differential classical eyelid conditioning.William A. Benish & David A. Grant - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (6):433-434.
- Trace and delay differential classical eyelid conditioning in human adults.Susan M. Ross, Leonard E. Ross & Deborah Werden - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):224-226.
- Differential characteristics of conditioned eyelid responses established by reflex and voluntary reinforcement.D. G. Marquis & J. M. Porter - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (4):347.
- Effects of differential instructions, differential payoffs, and the presence or absence of feedback on the percentage, latency, and amplitude of the conditioned eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein & I. Gormezano - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4):535.
- Semantic transfer of the differential conditioned eyelid response from words to objects.Thomas F. Hartman - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):194.
- "Appropriateness" of the stimulus-reinforcement contingency in instrumental differential conditioning of the eyelid response to the arithmetic concepts of "right" and "wrong".Robert A. Fleming, Louise E. Cerekwicki & David A. Grant - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):295.
- Effects of differential instructions and number of acquisition trials on extinction and reacquisition of the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):126.
- Effects of differential instructions, differential feedback, and ucs intensity on the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):56.
- Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
- Eyelid conditioned responses with various levels of anxiety.Martin R. Baron & James P. Connor - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (5):310.
- Eyelid conditioning as a function of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.Evelyn G. Walker - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (5):303.
- Eyelid conditioning as a function of unconditioned stimulus intensity and intertrial interval.William F. Prokasy Jr, David A. Grant & Nancy A. Myers - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (3):242.
- Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-US interval.Wallace R. McAllister - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (6):417.
- Eyelid conditioning performance under partial reinforcement as a function of UCS intensity.Leonard E. Ross & Kenneth W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (6):379.
- Eyelid conditioning as a function of the inter-trial interval.Kenneth W. Spence & Eugenia B. Norris - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (6):716.
- Eyelid conditioning performance as a function of emotion-producing instructions.Kenneth W. Spence & Henry Goldstein - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):291.
- Eyelid conditioning performance when the mode of reinforcement is changed from classical to instrumental avoidance and vice versa.Joseph B. Hellige & David A. Grant - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (4):710.
- Eyelid conditioning as influenced by the presence of sensitized Beta-responses.David A. Grant & Eugenia B. Norris - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):423.
- Simultaneous performance in eyelid conditioning and probability learning as a function of puff intensity.Alan L. Bernstein & Edward F. Rutledge - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):22.
- Human eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Harold D. Fishbein & Mary Leblanc - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):130.
- Latent inhibition in human eyelid conditioning.Paul Schnur & Charles J. Ksir - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):388.
- Performance changes in eyelid conditioning as related to the motivational and reinforcing properties of the UCS.M. A. Trapold & K. W. Spence - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (4):209.
- Anxiety and eyelid conditioning.Mark Ominsky & Gregory A. Kimble - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):471.
| 1 — 50 / 999 |
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-55b469568f-cdf2d uwo