Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Aronszajn trees on [aleph]2 and [aleph]3.Uri Abraham - 1983 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 24 (3):213.
  • Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
    The tree property at κ+ states that there are no Aronszajn trees on κ+, or, equivalently, that every κ+ tree has a cofinal branch. For singular strong limit cardinals κ, there is tension between the tree property at κ+ and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at κ; the former is typically the result of the presence of strongly compact cardinals in the background, and the latter is impossible above strongly compacts. In this paper, we reconcile the two. We prove (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The tree property below ℵ ω ⋅ 2.Spencer Unger - 2016 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 167 (3):247-261.
  • Fragility and indestructibility II.Spencer Unger - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (11):1110-1122.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
    From large cardinals we obtain the consistency of the existence of a singular cardinal κ of cofinality ω at which the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis fails, there is a bad scale at κ and κ ++ has the tree property. In particular this model has no special κ +-trees.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
    Assuming some large cardinals, a model of ZFC is obtained in which $\aleph_{\omega+1}$ carries no Aronszajn trees. It is also shown that if $\lambda$ is a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals, then $\lambda^+$ carries no Aronszajn trees.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations