Switch to: Citations

References in:

Editors’ Introduction

Science & Education 20 (5-6):401-409 (2011)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.Larry Laudan - 1983 - In Robert S. Cohen & Larry Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. D. Reidel. pp. 111--127.
  • How parapsychology could become a science.Paul M. Churchland - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):227 – 239.
    An important methodological argument is outlined in support of general theoretical challenges to the dominant materialist paradigm. The idea is that the empirical inadequacies of a dominant theory can be hidden from view by various factors, and will emerge from the shadows only when viewed from the perspective of a systematic conceptual alternative. The question then posed is whether parapsychology provides a conceptual alternative adequate to this task. The provisional conclusion drawn is that it does not. Some further consequences are (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought.Pascal Boyer - 2002 - Basic Books.
    Many of our questions about religion, says renowned anthropologist Pascal Boyer, are no longer mysteries. We are beginning to know how to answer questions such as "Why do people have religion?" Using findings from anthropology, cognitive science, linguistics, and evolutionary biology, Religion Explained shows how this aspect of human consciousness is increasingly admissible to coherent, naturalistic explanation. This brilliant and controversial book gives readers the first scientific explanation for what religious feeling is really about, what it consists of, and where (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   251 citations  
  • Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:223 - 234.
    Using astrology as a case study, this paper attempts to establish a criterion for demarcating science from pseudoscience. Numerous reasons for considering astrology to be a pseudoscience are evaluated and rejected; verifiability and falsifiability are briefly discussed. A theory is said to be pseudoscientific if and only if (1) it has been less progressive than alternative theories over a long period of time, and faces many unsolved problems, but (2) the community of practitioners makes little attempt to develop the theory (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism.Ronald L. Numbers & William Kimler - 1995 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (4):659.
  • The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism.R. L. Numbers & M. Bridgstock - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (6):664-664.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations