Switch to: Citations

References in:

Building Arguments Together or Alone? Using Learning Analytics to Study the Collaborative Construction of Argument Diagrams

In Brian K. Smith, Marcela Borge, Emma Mercier & Kyu Yon Lim (eds.), Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2017. Philadelphia, PA, USA: pp. 589-592 (2017)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. What Is the Argument? And Introduction to the Practice of Philosophy.Maralee Harrell - 2016 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
  • Improving First-Year Writing Using Argument Diagramming.Maralee Harrell & Danielle Wetzel - 2016 - In Martin Davies, Rob Barnett & Bob Ennis (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. pp. 213-232.
    There is substantial evidence from many domains that visual representations aid various forms of cognition. We aimed to determine whether learning to construct visual representations of argument structure enhanced the acquisition and development of argumentative writing skills within the context of first-year college writing course. We found a significant effect of the use of argument diagrams, and this effect was stable even when multiple plausible correlates were controlled for. These results suggest that natural⎯and relatively minor⎯modifications to standard first-year composition courses (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Will Structuring the Collaboration of Students Improve Their Argumentation?Oliver Scheuer, Bruce McLaren, Maralee Harrell & Armin Weinberger - unknown
    Learning to argue in a computer-mediated and structured fashion is investigated in this research. A study was conducted to compare dyads that were scripted in their computer-mediated collaboration with dyads that were not scripted. A process analysis of the chats of the dyads showed that the scripted experimental group used significantly more words, engaged in significantly more broadening and deepening of the discussion, and appeared to engage in more critical and objective argumentation than the non-scripted control group.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations