epistemic inclusion: a key challenge for RRI

Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ten years after introducing the RRI concept, a reflection on its key ambitions seems called for, now that RRI enters the global arena. This paper focues on the key challenge that RRI is currently facing: epistemic inclusion. From the beginning, there has been the awareness that RRI must be open to multiple voices and perspectives, coming from academia, and also from society at large. Besides representing impressive bodies of knowledge, academic disciplines face knowledge gaps as well and must reach out to other knowledge forms, e.g. practical, experiential, and indigenous knowledge. This paper analyses the challenges involved in epistemic inclusion while outlining viable pathways towards addressing them, based on experiences in European projects as our ‘laboratory'. After discussing interdisciplinarity, participatory research, and epistemic pluralism, while also addressing the academic reward system. Special attention is given to indigenous knowledge as a case study for epistemic pluralism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Inclusion and the Epistemic Benefits of Deliberation.John B. Min - 2016 - Contemporary Pragmatism 13 (1):48-69.
Diversity and Epistemic Marginalisation: The Case of Inclusive Education.Kai Horsthemke - 2021 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 40 (6):549-565.
The significance of epistemic blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (2):807-828.
Including the Epistemic in Democratic Music Pedagogy.Tessa MacLean - 2023 - Philosophy of Music Education Review 31 (1):25-42.
Reflection On: On Reflection.Declan Smithies - 2016 - Analysis 76 (1):55-69.
The Value of Inclusion.Franziska Felder - 2018 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 52 (1):54-70.
The Reliability Challenge in Moral Epistemology.Matt Lutz - 2020 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 15:284-308.
Doxastic Dilemmas and Epistemic Blame.Sebastian Schmidt - forthcoming - Philosophical Issues.
Forgetting memory skepticism.Matthew Frise & Kevin McCain - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):253-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-25

Downloads
95 (#181,388)

6 months
95 (#47,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Hub Zwart
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Vincent Blok
Wageningen University and Research

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The weirdest people in the world?Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):61-83.
The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.V. Blok & P. Lemmens - 2015 - In Bert- Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swiwestra & Jeroen Van Den Hoven (eds.), Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. pp. 19-35.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed.Paulo Freire - 1970 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Edited by Myra Bergman Ramos, Donaldo P. Macedo & Ira Shor.

View all 14 references / Add more references