Democracy as a Way to Social Compromise

Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):1-5 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In modern society, democracy as a symbol of social civilization and progress is cherished. Any government or organization, whether truly democratic or not, will claim that it is democratic while its opponents are not. However, as a historical notion, democracy does not possess the quality of absoluteness. In my view, democracy, in its original meaning, should be understood as a way to social compromise, whose aim is to guarantee a relatively fair political life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy as a Way to Social Compromise.Zhen Han & Lihe Dong - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):1-5.
Social Democracy.Ben Jackson - 2013 - In Michael Freeden, Lyman Tower Sargent & Marc Stears (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford University Press. pp. 348.
Why a fair compromise requires deliberation.Friderike Spang - 2021 - Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17 (1):38-47.
John Dewey and Democracy.Peter E. Okeke - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Calgary (Canada)
Pragmatism, Social Democracy, and the Politics of Democratic Association.Ed Quish - 2020 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 12 (1).
Democracy in Nigeria: An Illusion or Reality.Mfonobong David Udoudom - 2019 - International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal 5 (20).

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#298,385)

6 months
4 (#863,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references