Soul and self: Comparing chinese philosophy and greek philosophy

Philosophy Compass 3 (4):604-618 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Comparative philosophy has been interested in issues such as whether the familiar Western concepts of the soul and self can be applied in understanding Chinese philosophy about human selfhood and whether there are alternative Chinese modes of thinking about these concepts. I will outline a comparison of the main concerns of the Greeks and Chinese philosophers in their discussion about the soul and self, and examine some of the major comparative theories that are recently developed. The comparative discussion is significant in helping us understand each tradition's views of soul and self in its own terms, and in identifying alternatives to familiar modes of thinking. However, we should avoid looking for simplified uniformity in each tradition and overgeneralizing the contrasts between China and Greece.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,605

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

97 (#153,461)

6 months
2 (#528,188)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
The morality of happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Fragility of Goodness.Martha Nussbaum - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):376-383.
Confucius--the secular as sacred.Herbert Fingarette - 1972 - New York,: Harper & Row.

View all 17 references / Add more references