Abortion in South Australia, 1971–86: an update

Journal of Biosocial Science 23 (3):285-296 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Official statistics on abortion in South Australia for the period 1971–86 are analysed in terms of incidence, age of patients and nuptiality, reasons for abortion, method of termination, period of gestation, previous abortions and concurrent sterilisation. Demographic implications are discussed and recommendations are made for more education and counselling, especially for younger and unmarried women for whom the incidence of abortion seems to be rising

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trends in legalized abortion in South Australia: 1970–81.Farhat Yusuf & Dora Briggs - 1985 - Journal of Biosocial Science 17 (2):215-221.
The other abortion myth—the failure of the common law.Kate Gleeson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):69-81.
Chemical Abortion in Australia.Marcia Riordan - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Doubts about a Classic Defence of Abortion.Jo Difford - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):122-129.
Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
Gallagher Australia update.Gavin Lee - 2013 - Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory 229:21.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
20 (#767,676)

6 months
8 (#361,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Trends in legalized abortion in South Australia: 1970–81.Farhat Yusuf & Dora Briggs - 1985 - Journal of Biosocial Science 17 (2):215-221.

Add more references