Abstract

Because idealism takes mind to be a fundamental reality, one would expect idealistically oriented philosophers to be especially alert to how mind actually occurs. However, like philosophers generally, most idealists study consciousness exclusively from the standpoint of focused and structured states of mind, using such cases as paradigmatic. Whether we examine Plato, Berkeley, Kant, Fichte, Husserl, or any other philosopher with idealistic tendencies, their accounts of mind take concepts like knowing, self, identity, and intentionality to be central. As a result, such accounts virtually always interpret consciousness as unitary and egological. Although this interpretive tradition pervades philosophical understandings of mind, Charles Scott’s radical and important book provides strong reasons for skepticism about its adequacy. This rich and interesting volume consists of five essays, each of which takes up a distinct theme: “Interpreting,” “Being One and Being Many,” “Accord and Discord on the Border,” “Utter Darkness and Utter Light,” and “Being Aware.” Written separately, these essays share a common philosophical approach and a related set of themes: interpretation, difference, wholeness, language, and history, among others. Taken together, they offer a startling and powerful way of conceiving mind.