Relation between response amplitude and reinforcement

Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (5):634 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0023150

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Amplitude of response and the delay-retention effect.Yvonne Brackbill, William E. Boblitt, Douglas Davlin & John E. Wagner - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (1):57.
Response latency as a function of the amount of reinforcement.David Zeaman - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466.
The effect of varying conditions of reinforcement upon a simple running response.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (1):53.
Some relations between the intensive properties of the consummatory response and reinforcement.George Collier, Frederick A. Knarr & Melvin H. Marx - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (5):484.
The relation between mean reward and mean reinforcement.Allan M. Leventhal, Richard F. Morrell, Elmer F. Morgan Jr & Charles C. Perkins Jr - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):284.
Positive and negative partial-reinforcement extinction effects carried through continuous reinforcement, changed motivation, and changed response.Robert R. Ross - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):492.
Retention and subsequent extinction of a simple running response following varying conditions of reinforcement.F. W. Finger - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):120.
The retention of a simple running response after varying amounts of reinforcement.F. A. Mote & F. W. Finger - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (4):317.
Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response.Harvard L. Armus - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (1):61.
The effect of differential non-reinforcement of the incorrect response on the learning of the correct response in the simple T-maze.M. Ray Denny & Morton D. Dunham - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):382.
Response force as a function of amount of reinforcement.Vincent Di Lollo, W. D. Ensminger & J. M. Notterman - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1):27.
Response speed, amplitude, and resistance to extinction as joint functions of work and length of behavior chain.Robert Frank Weiss - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (3):245.
A quantitative investigation of the delay-of-reinforcement gradient.C. T. Perin - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (1):37.
The reinforcement relation as a function of instrumental response base rate.Robert W. Schaeffer - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):419.
The effect of different amounts of reinforcement upon the acquisition and extinction of a simple running response.F. A. Mote - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (3):216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
14 (#968,362)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references