In defence of an argument for Evans's principle: A rejoinder to Vahid

Analysis 66 (2):167–170 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In (2004) I gave an argument for Evans’s principle Whatever justifies me in believing that p also justifies me in believing that I believe that p Hamid Vahid (2005) raises two objections against this argument. I show that the first is harmless and that the second is a non sequitur.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
17 (#896,762)

6 months
218 (#12,786)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John N. Williams
Singapore Management University