Abstract

But of course Derrida’s appeal to context and to authorial intention constitutes an abandonment of the deconstructive method. As Christopher Norris has written of de Man, “we read in defiance of his own repeated counsel” if we read his work “by asking what might have been the motives, political or otherwise, that led to his adopting the stance they exhibit.”2Derrida emphasizes repeatedly that de Man’s objectionable acts were committed almost half a century ago, when he was twenty-one and twenty-two years old. That’s an important argument. But the moral problems de man poses do not end in 1942 when he stopped writing for Le Soir; a second and in some ways more serious moral problem recurs throughout his adult-life, during which de Man kept his youthful pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic writings a secret. John Wiener is professor of history at the University of California, Irvine. His articles “Deconstructing de Man” and “Debating de Man” appeared in The Nation