II—No duty to resist : why individual resistance is an ineffective response to dominant beauty ideals

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 122 (1):27-46 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the way to reduce the power of overdemanding beauty ideals is not to advocate that individuals have a ‘duty to resist’, a duty to stop engaging in appearance enhancing practices and body work. I begin by arguing against the claim that women who ‘do’ beauty are suffering from false consciousness. I then give four further additional arguments against advocating a ‘duty to resist’ as an effective means to challenge dominant beauty norms. First, that as a tactic it is ineffective. Second, it is an individual approach which divides and silences. Third, it induces shame and blame, and undermines effective collective action. Fourth, it fails to recognize the privilege of the group norms which make resistance possible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-14

Downloads
26 (#599,981)

6 months
6 (#702,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heather Widdows
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

Personal Beauty and Personal Agency.Madeline Martin-Seaver - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (12):e12953.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Autonomy and Oppressive Socialization.Paul Benson - 1991 - Social Theory and Practice 17 (3):385-408.
Structural injustice and the Requirements of Beauty.Heather Widdows - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (2):251-269.

Add more references