How Barth Got Aquinas Wrong: A Reply to Archie J. Spencer on Causality and Christocentrism

Nova et Vetera 7:241-270 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critique de la sociologie de H. Spencer.Barth Barth - 1893 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 36:448.
The Way of Aquinas: Its Importance for Moral Theology.D. Stephen Long - 2006 - Studies in Christian Ethics 19 (3):339-356.
What Is Cognition? A Reply to Some Critics.Robert Pasnau - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):483-490.
Reply to Wallace's 'on making actions morally wrong'.Richard Swinburne - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):551 - 552.
Aquinas on the divine ideas as exemplar causes (review).Antoine Côté - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 624-625.
Causality and determinism: Tension, or outright conflict?Carl Hoefer - 2004 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 29 (2):99-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Trace of Similarity within Even Greater Dissimilarity.Mariusz Tabaczek - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 23 (1):95-132.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references