Who Asks Questions and Who Benefits from Answers: Understanding Institutions in Terms of Social Epistemic Dependencies

Erkenntnis:1-31 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper develops the idea that institutions are enablers. However, they do not only enable individuals and collectives to achieve their goals; first and foremost, they enable individuals and collectives to have a goal, to select and recognize certain possible states of affairs as targets of action, and as a result, to have a demand – especially a demand for further institutions. I make the case that properly functioning institutions are dedicated to making these states of affairs epistemically acquaintable. What I will stress in particular is that acquaintance is first realized in the form of questions, which are linguistic expressions of acts of problematization. However, I will discuss less what an individual subject questions, but rather what the social dynamic of questioning is. This dynamic will be conceptualized in terms of epistemic dependence, and it will be singled out as the dynamic that gives rise to institutions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding, Truth, and Epistemic Goals.Kareem Khalifa - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):944-956.
Recent Work in Standpoint Epistemology.Briana Toole - 2021 - Analysis 81 (2):338-350.
Introduction : a guided tour of metametaphysics.David Manley - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Erotetic Epistemic Logic.Michal Peliš - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (3):357-381.
What’s Epistemic About Epistemic Paternalism?Elizabeth Jackson - 2022 - In Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed (eds.), Epistemic Autonomy. New York: Routledge. pp. 132–150.
Epistemic Autonomy.Jonathan Matheson & Kirk Lougheed (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Elgin on Science, Art and Understanding.Jochen Briesen - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (6):2651-2671.
On some questions concerning strong compactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):819-829.
Moral epistemology.Margaret Urban Walker - 2017 - In Alison M. Jaggar & Iris Marion Young (eds.), A Companion to Feminist Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 361–371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-28

Downloads
32 (#490,373)

6 months
17 (#142,935)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Konrad Werner
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge in a social world.Alvin I. Goldman - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description.Bertrand Russell - 1911 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11:108--28.
Knowing the Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.

View all 28 references / Add more references