Why Rawls is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian

In Rex Martin & David A. Reidy (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples. Blackwell. pp. 95–113 (2006-01-01)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter contains section titled: Justice as Fairness Rawls and the Cosmopolitan Egalitarians The Puzzle of Rawls's Rejection of Global Egalitarianism Rawls's Fundamental Norm of Legitimacy Why Rawls is not a Cosmopolitan Why Rawls is not a Global Egalitarian The Impossibility of Pure Cosmopolitanism Conclusion Notes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Contradiction in the Egalitarian Theory of Justice.Michael W. Howard - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:35-55.
The coherence of Rawls's plea for democratic equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Rawls's A theory of justice: an introduction.Jon Mandle - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The unity of rawls’s work.Leif Wenar - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):265-275.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
234 (#86,268)

6 months
9 (#308,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leif Wenar
King's College London

Citations of this work

Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.Gillian Brock - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Catriona McKinnon.
Public Reason.Jonathan Quong - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 38 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references