Systematicity and Complexity of IDEA Metaphors in Chinese

Metaphor and Symbol 31 (4):230-249 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor is characterized by two important features—systematicity and complexity. This article is primarily concerned with IDEA metaphors in Chinese and attempts to explore how systematicity and complexity have structured the IDEA metaphorical hierarchical system. Four principal IDEA metaphors are investigated, namely, “IDEAS ARE PEOPLE”, “IDEAS ARE PLANTS”, “IDEAS ARE OBJECTS”, and “IDEAS ARE FOOD”. It is found that the relationship between metaphors and human thought is systematic as well as complex and that systematicity and complexity of IDEA metaphors intertwine with each other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

More about metaphor.Max Black - 1977 - Dialectica 31 (3‐4):431-457.
Why Kantian Symbols Cannot Be Kantian Metaphors.Stefan Forrester - 2012 - Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (2):107-127.
Spatial Metaphors for Morality: A Perspective from Chinese.Ning Yu - 2016 - Metaphor and Symbol 31 (2):108-125.
Towards a metaphorical biology.R. C. Paton - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (3):279-294.
The Eightfold Way to the theory of complexity: a prologue.Philip W. Anderson - 1994 - In G. Cowan, D. Pines & D. Elliott Meltzer (eds.), Complexity: metaphors, models, and reality. Perseus Books. pp. 7–16.
Feminist ethics and the metaphor of AIDS.Susan Sherwin - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):343 – 364.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-12

Downloads
36 (#442,490)

6 months
4 (#783,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Xu Wen
Renmin University of China

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theories are buildings revisited.Joseph E. Grady - 1997 - Cognitive Linguistics 8 (4):267-290.

Add more references