Radical Philosophy Today 5:49-67 (2007)
AbstractKarl Marx claims that alienation inheres in all wage labor. I raise questions about the applicability of this claim to subjects of patriarchy. In the first section, I discuss industrial wage labor and its allure for women who were trying to escape the norms of familial patriarchy. In the second section, I extend this criticism of Marx’s claim by considering the racially enslaved subjects of the Antebellum American South, for whom economicallyrecognized wage labor was still a bloody political battle. Finally, I turn to the identification of working class women and sexuality, in order to show how wage labor offered liberation from narrow bourgeois sexual strictures. I conclude by reassessing the viability of Marx’s critique of alienation, taking into account the standpoints from which wage labor itself was a considerable political achievement
Similar books and articles
The Research Subject as Wage Earner.James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.
Marxian Value Theory and the Labor — Labor Power Distinction.Gilbert L. Skillman - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (4):427 - 451.
Capitalism and the Oppression of Women: Marx Revisited.Martha E. Gimenez - 2005 - Science and Society 69 (1):11 - 32.
Voluntary Losses and Wage Compensation.Simon Wigley - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):363-376.
Can the Alienated Make a Socialist Revolution? Reflections About the Prospects for Socialism.Richard Schmitt - 2006 - Radical Philosophy Today 2006:175-194.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads