Dissensus and Common Grounds in Negotiation: A Negotiation Analytic Perspective

Abstract

Negotiation analysis is a branch of mathematical decision theory involving a dialectical rationality standard for the resolution of dissensus. Negotiations are settings of group decision making where people cooperate to arrive at a joint decision representing a mutually acceptable solution of the negotiation problem. Criteria of what is mutually acceptable can be regarded as common grounds. They serve as stopping conditions for the argumentation process during negotiation. Fairness and efficiency are examples.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
24 (#647,262)

6 months
24 (#148,454)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references