Two questions for Professor Vallier

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):608-615 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kevin Vallier claims to have attained a ‘great goal’ of the social contract tradition: ‘to show that there are regimes supported by the reason of the public and that have authority for citizens in those regimes’. I contend that his argument depends upon changing the meanings of ‘reason of the public’ and ‘authority’, and conclude that he has not attained the goal he claims.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trust in a polarized age: a reply to critics.Kevin Vallier - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):616-627.
Shared intentions, public reason, and political autonomy.Blain Neufeld - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):776-804.
Natural Law and Public Reason in Kant’s Political Philosophy.Daniel M. Weinstock - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):389-411.
Introduction: public justification, legitimacy, and social trust.Adam Gjesdal - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):579-584.
Does Social Trust Justify the Public Justification Principle?Collis Tahzib - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (3):461-478.
Recognized rights as devices of public reason.Gerald Gaus - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):111-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-03

Downloads
9 (#449,242)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Weithman
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

Add more references