Cut and gamma I: Propositional and constant domain R

Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):887-909 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The main object of this article is to give two novel proofs of the admissibility of Ackermann’s rule (γ) for the propositional relevant logic R. The results are established as corollaries of cut elimination for systems of tableaux for R. Cut elimination, in turn, is established both nonconstructively (as a corollary of completeness) and constructively (using Gentzen-like methods). The extensibility of the techniques is demonstrated by showing that (γ) is admissible for RQ* (R with constant domain quantifiers). The status of the admissibility of (γ) for RQ* was, to the best of the author’s knowledge, an open problem. Further extensions of these results will be explored in the sequel(s).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-30

Downloads
31 (#718,254)

6 months
5 (#1,015,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yale Weiss
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevance Logic.Michael Dunn & Greg Restall - 1983 - In Dov M. Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Proof Analysis in Modal Logic.Sara Negri - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5-6):507-544.
Models for entailment.Kit Fine - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (4):347 - 372.
Proof analysis in intermediate logics.Roy Dyckhoff & Sara Negri - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1):71-92.

View all 17 references / Add more references