Correction referring to: Longitudinal observations call into question the scientific consensus that humans are unaffected by lunar cycles

Bioessays 43 (8):2170083 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Solar and lunar observations at Istanbul in the 1570s.John M. Steele & S. Mohammad Mozaffari - 2015 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 69 (4):343-362.
What are referring expressions? How do we recognize them?Stig W. Jørgensen - 1998 - Pragmatics and Cognition 6 (1-2):99-120.
Some observations on truth hierarchies: A correction.Philip D. Welch - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):857-860.
Correction to: Framing Effects and Fuzzy Traces: ‘Some’ Observations.Sarah A. Fisher - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (2):525-525.
Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory.Roger Ariew - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):213-226.
Galileo's lunar observations: do they imply the rejection of traditional lunar theory?Fred Wilson - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):557-570.
Including the Unaffected.Michael L. Frazer - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (4):377-395.
Eclipse theory in the Jing chu li: Part I. The adoption of lunar velocity.Yuzhen Guan - 2015 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 69 (1):103-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
3 (#1,706,939)

6 months
2 (#1,187,206)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references