J. Habermas and the Art of Dialogue: The Practicability of the Ideal Speech Situation

Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 28 (1):1-8 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critical reasoning is a core element of the P4C program. Yet, the appearance of postmodernism, multiculturalism and ethnocentrism casts doubt on the Western concept of rationality and demands that its claim of universal purview be justified. In this context, the desideratum of this article is to provide a concept of rationality that has the potential to serve as the theoretical basis of reasoning in P4C. This is an important task, because if we cannot defend P4C against the postmodern criticism of rationality, we cannot claim that it is a multicultural program in a true sense, nor can we defend it against the charge that this is just another attempt of western colonization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Agency in Modernity.Nancy Ruth Crocker - 1991 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Habermas and the Grounding of Critical Theory.Dominick LaCapra - 1977 - History and Theory 16 (3):237-264.
What is a validity claim?Joseph Heath - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41.
Ideal rationality and hand waving.Reed Richter - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (2):147 – 156.
Freedom of communicative action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?