- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A reply to Peter Boghsonnian and James Lindsay's, ‘What comes after postmodernism?’
Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (7):679-680 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Peter Boghossian—What comes after postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1346-1347.
What comes after postmodernism?Peter Pericles Trifonas - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1362-1363.
What? Comes after postmodernism.Itay Snir - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1624-1625.
What comes after postmodernism?Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1498-1499.
What comes after postmodernism? Going fishing.Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1614-1615.
Keeping the question ‘what comes after postmodernism?’ open.Karin Murris - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1600-1601.
What comes after postmodernism and how this will affect educational theory? – From a Chinese Taoist perspective.Fan Yang - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1445-1446.
An argument for what comes after postmodernism, and perhaps all future -isms.Haroldo A. Fontaine - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (14):1618-1619.
Postmodernism in the afterlife.Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesar, Liz Jackson & Tina Besley - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (4):325-327.
What Science Means for Postmodernist Epistemology and the Philosophy of Education (Repr.).Thaddeus Metz - 1920 - In Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesar, Liz Jackson & Tina Besley (eds.), What Comes after Postmodernism in Educational Theory? Routledge. pp. 1398-1399.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-03-02
Downloads
361 (#59,063)
6 months
114 (#45,344)
2019-03-02
Downloads
361 (#59,063)
6 months
114 (#45,344)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo