A brief comment on Maxwell[-Huygens] spacetime

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63:34-38 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I provide an alternative characterization of a "standard of rotation" in the context of classical spacetime structure that does not refer to any covariant derivative operator.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Huygens' designs for a simple microscope.Marian Fournier - 1989 - Annals of Science 46 (6):575-596.
Huygens et la théorie musicale / Huygens and music theory.Andre Charrak - 2003 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 56 (1):59-78.
Is Empty Spacetime a Physical Thing?Diego Meschini & Markku Lehto - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (8):1193-1216.
Huygens versus Fermat: No clear winner.Paul J. H. Schoemaker - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):781-782.
What price spacetime substantivalism? The hole story.John Earman & John Norton - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):515-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-16

Downloads
45 (#351,297)

6 months
17 (#146,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Weatherall
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Some Philosophical Prehistory of the (Earman-Norton) hole argument.James Owen Weatherall - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 70:79-87.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations