Are Newtonian Gravitation and Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation Theoretically Equivalent?

Erkenntnis 81 (5):1073-1091 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that a criterion of theoretical equivalence due to Glymour :227–251, 1977) does not capture an important sense in which two theories may be equivalent. I then motivate and state an alternative criterion that does capture the sense of equivalence I have in mind. The principal claim of the paper is that relative to this second criterion, the answer to the question posed in the title is “yes”, at least on one natural understanding of Newtonian gravitation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Motion of a Body in Newtonian Theories.James Owen Weatherall - 2011 - Journal of Mathematical Physics 52 (3):032502.
Newtonian Spacetime Structure in Light of the Equivalence Principle.Eleanor Knox - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (4):863-880.
Indeterminism, classical gravitation and non-collision singularities.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):269 – 274.
Inertia, gravitation and metaphysics.Lawrence Sklar - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (1):1-23.
Is Newtonian cosmology really inconsistent?David B. Malament - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (4):489-510.
Inertial motion, explanation, and the foundations of classical spacetime theories.James Owen Weatherall - 2016 - In Dennis Lehmkuhl, Gregor Schiemann & Erhard Scholz (eds.), Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. New York, NY: Birkhauser. pp. 13-42.
A limited conventionalist critique of Newtonian space-time.David Zaret - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (3):474-494.
Categories and the Foundations of Classical Field Theories.James Owen Weatherall - forthcoming - In Elaine Landry (ed.), Categories for the Working Philosopher. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Evolutionary and Newtonian Forces.Christopher Hitchcock & Joel D. Velasco - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1:39-77.
Friedman׳s Thesis.Ryan Samaroo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):129-138.
A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory.John D. Norton - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:412 - 420.
On (Some) Explanations in Physics.James Owen Weatherall - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):421-447.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
149 (#122,736)

6 months
26 (#109,596)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Weatherall
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

Duality and ontology.Baptiste Le Bihan & James Read - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (12):e12555.
How to count structure.Thomas William Barrett - 2022 - Noûs 56 (2):295-322.
What Theoretical Equivalence Could Not Be.Trevor Teitel - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (12):4119-4149.
Fundamental and Emergent Geometry in Newtonian Physics.David Wallace - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):1-32.
Sophistication about Symmetries.Neil Dewar - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (2):485-521.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory and Evidence.Clark N. Glymour - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
Space, Time, and Spacetime.Lawrence Sklar - 1974 - University of California Press.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.

View all 37 references / Add more references