(Re)turning to the Modern: Radical Feminism and the Post-modern Turn

In Renate Klein & Diane Bell (eds.), Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed. Spinifex Press. pp. 280--296 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that certain features of postmodernism are bad for feminism and that there are ways in which modernism provides a better platform for a gender analysis. Specifically, by arguing against the category "woman" some forms of postmodernism undermine the political gains of focusing on gender.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Poetics of imagining: modern to post-modern.Richard Kearney - 1998 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Defining the post-modern.Margaret Rose - 1992 - In Charles Jencks (ed.), The Post-modern reader. New York: St. Martin' Press. pp. 119--136.
The post-modern agenda.Charles Jencks - 1992 - In The Post-modern reader. New York: St. Martin' Press. pp. 10--39.
The narratology of lay ethics.Jean-Pierre Dupuy - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):153-170.
The radical attitude and modern political theory.Jason Edwards - 2007 - New York, N.Y.: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristin Waters
Brandeis University

Citations of this work

Postmodern Feminist Politics: The Art of the (Im)Possible?Sasha Roseneil - 1999 - European Journal of Women's Studies 6 (2):161-182.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references