The Postmodern Greenhouse: Creating Virtual Carbon Reductions From Business-as-Usual Energy Politics

Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 21 (6):443-455 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Climate change presents a fundamental challenge to the current global energy regime. Under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, the international community is developing the architecture of a policy response. Three serious flaws are examined: (a) the potential sacrifice of small island states, (b) the use of market-based policy measures to commodify the atmospheric commons, and (c) the substitution of carbon sequestration for meaningful reductions in energy use. The authors’ analysis of the politics of climate change, based on these issues, suggests a new understanding of ecology is emerging—what they term postmodern ecology—in which a global environmental crisis is risked to secure the future of the world energy regime. An alternative, based on principles of sustainability and equity, is proposed that would require abandoning the global energy status quo.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate Social Responsibility: A Catalyst for Progressive Change in the US Energy Sector?Diana Mangalagiu - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:212-217.
A new global deal on climate change.Cameron J. Hepburn & Nicholas Stern - 2008 - Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
Thirteen Years After Rio: The State of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Canada.Shahram Karimi - 2005 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 25 (6):497-506.
An energy revolution for the greenhouse century.Martin Hoffert - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (3):981-1000.
Mediating climate politics: The surprising case of Brazil.John Urry & Carmen Dayrell - 2015 - European Journal of Social Theory 18 (3):257-273.
Two Moral Arguments for a Global Social Cost of Carbon.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (1):60-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-27

Downloads
8 (#1,313,626)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations