Monkeys are curious about counterfactual outcomes

&
Cognition 189 (C):1-10 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.009

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Biases in preferences for sequences of outcomes in monkeys.Tommy C. Blanchard, Lauren S. Wolfe, Ivo Vlaev, Joel S. Winston & Benjamin Y. Hayden - 2014 - Cognition 130 (3):289-299.
Judgements vs affective evaluations of counterfactual outcomes.Jens Andreas Terum & Frode Svartdal - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (1):78 - 95.
Counterfactual Explanation in Literature and the Social Sciences.Daniel Dohrn - 2011 - In D. Birke & M. Butter (eds.), Counterfactual Thinking, Counterfactual Writing. DeGruyter. pp. 45-61.
Visual Representation in the Wild: How Rhesus Monkeys.Elizabeth S. Spelke & Marc D. Hauser - unknown
Influence of outcome valence in the subjective experience of episodic past, future, and counterfactual thinking.Felipe De Brigard - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (3):1085-1096.
The Making of Might-Have-Beens: Effects of Free Will Belief on Counterfactual Thinking.Jessica L. Alquist, Sarah E. Ainsworth & Roy Baumesiter - 2014 - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41 (2):268-283.
On the Curious Range of Responses to Our Curious Case: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Curious Case of the De-ICD: Negotiating the Dynamics of Autonomy and Paternalism in Complex Clinical Relationships”.Daryl Pullman & Kathleen Hodgkinson - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):4-6.
IV-Counterfactual Entailment.David Barnett - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):73-97.
Counterfactual Desirability.Richard Bradley & H. Orii Stefansson - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2):485-533.
“How monkeys see the world.” Why monkeys?A. H. Harcourt - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (1):160-161.
Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Michael J. Beran & J. David Smith - 2011 - Cognition 120 (1):90-105.
Fair Chance and Modal Consequentialism.H. Orri Stefánsson - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (3):371-395.
Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans.Dustin J. Merritt, Daniel Casasanto & Elizabeth M. Brannon - 2010 - Cognition 117 (2):191-202.
Analysing causality: The opposite of counterfactual is factual.Jim Bogen - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (1):3 – 26.
The development of counterfactual reasoning about doubly-determined events.Teresa McCormack, Maggie Ho, Charlene Gribben, Eimear O'Connor & Christoph Hoerl - 2018 - Cognitive Development 45:1-9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-17

Downloads
23 (#682,085)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Natural Curiosity.Jennifer Nagel - forthcoming - In Artūrs Logins & Jacques-Henri Vollet (eds.), Putting Knowledge to Work: New Directions for Knowledge-First Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cognitive maps in rats and men.Edward C. Tolman - 1948 - Psychological Review 55 (4):189-208.
A Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude Elwood Shannon - 1948 - Bell System Technical Journal 27 (April 1924):379–423.

View all 8 references / Add more references