Ovarian influences on female development: Revolutionary or evolutionary?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):339-340 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Fitch & Denenberg target article focuses almost exclusively on short gestation mammals, which differ substantially from long-gestation mammals in the timing and type of hormonal contribution to their sexual differentiation. Conclusions regarding the role of ovaries in female sexual differentiation may accordingly apply to only a limited number of species. Specific criticisms of the organizational effects of hormones stem from an incomplete reading of the original literature. The mechanisms proposed in this target article reflect an extension of the principle of hormonal organization, not a revolutionary restructuring.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indirect influences of gonadal hormones on sexual differentiation.Lesley J. Rogers - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):337-338.
Aggression in female mammals: Is it really rare?Paul F. Brain - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):218-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#795,462)

6 months
6 (#509,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references