Problems of Framing

Stance 13:118-129 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Fatalism and Time,” Mark Bernstein argues against the notion that the B-theory of time is fatalistic. However, when he frames the differences between the A-theory of time and the B-theory of time, I argue that Bernstein imports some troublesome conceptual baggage in the form of what he calls “atemporal truths,” which, in the end, dooms the B-theory to fatalism, the consequence he sought to avoid. From my examination of Bernstein’s framing of the B-theory of time, I suggest that, given the proper framing of that theory, it is not doomed to fatalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Time.Ned Markosian - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Risk aversion and the long run.Johanna Thoma - 2019 - Ethics 129 (2):230-253.
Fatalism and Time.Mark Bernstein - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (3):461-.
What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects.John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Introduction: Framing the problems of time and identity.Matthew Slater - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O.'Rourke & Harry Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-16

Downloads
7 (#1,387,389)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The unreality of time.John Ellis McTaggart - 1908 - Mind 17 (68):457-474.
Fatalism and Time.Mark Bernstein - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (3):461-.

Add more references