Why not model spoken word recognition instead of phoneme monitoring?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):349-350 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Norris, McQueen & Cutler present a detailed account of the decision stage of the phoneme monitoring task. However, we question whether this contributes to our understanding of the speech recognition process itself, and we fail to see why phonotactic knowledge is playing a role in phoneme recognition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The trouble with merge: Modeling speeded target detection.Jonathan Grainger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-332.
It's good . . . But is it ART?Paul A. Luce, Stephen D. Goldinger & Michael S. Vitevitch - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):336-336.
Merging information versus speech recognition.Irene Appelbaum - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
A phoneme effect in visual word recognition.A. Rey - 1998 - Cognition 68 (3):B71-B80.
Feedback: A general mechanism in the brain.Marie Montant - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):340-341.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#470,721)

6 months
7 (#492,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.

View all 38 references / Add more references