It's good . . . But is it ART?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):336-336 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We applaud Norris et al.'s critical review of the literature on lexical effects in phoneme decision making, and we sympathize with their attempt to reconcile autonomous models of word recognition with current research. However, we suggest that adaptive resonance theory (ART) may provide a coherent account of the data while preserving limited inhibitory feedback among certain lexical and sublexical representations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theories of art.Moshe Barasch - 1985 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Moshe Barasch.
Resonance within and between linguistic beings.Stephen D. Goldinger & Tamiko Azuma - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-200.
On the cluster account of art.Thomas Adajian - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
Bring ART into the ACT.Stephen Grossberg - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):610-611.
What good are the arts?John Carey - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#995,076)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references