Pascalova sázka

Filosofie Dnes 4 (2):19-30 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Článek analyzuje argument Pascalovy sázky a některé klíčové námitky proti ní – kritiku Antonyho Duffa, Alana Hájka a tradiční námitku mnoha Bohů. Pascalův argument je reformulován tak, aby těmto námitkám co nejlépe odolal. Analýza ukazuje, že revidovaná podoba sázky zůstává otevřeným problémem teorie rozhodování.The article analyzes some important reasons pro and contra Pascal`s wager argument. Many gods objection and objections by Antony Duff and Alan Hájek are discussed. A reformulation of Pascal`s wager is offered in order to make the case for Pascal`s conclusion stronger. It is shown that some form of wager could still represent a serious problem for rational decision theory.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.26806/fd.v4i2.299

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Antony Duff and the Philosophy.Mark R. Rezflftmd Rowan Crufi - 2011 - In Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
Antony Duff and the Philosophy of Punishment.Mark R. Reiff & Rowan Cruft - 2011 - In Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
Calling Antony Duff to Account: Rowan Cruft, Mathew H. Kramer, Mark R. Reiff : Crime, Punishment and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.Malcolm Thorburn - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):737-751.
In Response.R. A. Duff - 2011 - In Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
Duff on Attempts.Larry Alexander - 2011 - In Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
‘Who’s Still Standing?’ A Comment on Antony Duff’s Preconditions of Criminal Liability.Matt Matravers - 2006 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):320-330.
Duff on Hart Treatment.Matt Matravers - 2011 - In Rowan Cruft, Matthew H. Kramer & Mark R. Reiff (eds.), Crime, Punishment, and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff. Oxford University Press.
Punishing Noncitizens.Bill Wringe - 2020 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (3):384-400.
Jazyková komunikace a hodnotová atmosféra.Ladislav Tondl - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (4):389-397.
Argumentacja Alana Hájka dowodząca wadliwości zakładu Pascala.Marek Wójtowicz - 2010 - Folia Philosophica 28:193--209.
Is Accomplice Liability Superfluous?Antony Duff - unknown
The Theory of Semisets.Petr Vopěnka & Petr Hájek - 1972 - Amsterdam, Netherlands and London, England: North Holland.
Paradigm intention.A. P. Simester - 1992 - Law and Philosophy 11 (3):235 - 263.
Slimy stones and philosophy: some interpretations of tohu wa-bohu.Hannu Töyrylä - 2000 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 21 (1-2):91-110.
Die Interpretation de Begriffe Tohu und Bohu in der jüdischen Philosophie des Mittelalters L'interprétation des concepts tohu et bohu dans la philosophie juive du Moyen Age.H. Simon - 1988 - Kairos (misc) 30:64-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references