Prioriteit voor patienten met een lagere levenskwaliteit

Filosofie En Praktijk 31:40-51 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper critically analyses the priority-setting rules used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK and proposed by the Netherlands' Council on Public Health and Health Care (RVZ). It argues that neither gives proper weight to improving the lot of those who are worse off than others.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice, health, and healthcare.Norman Daniels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care.John C. Moskop - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):329-338.
Equality versus priority: A misleading distinction.Daniel M. Hausman - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238.
How compatible are liberty and equality in structuring a health care system?Paul T. Menzel - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):281 – 306.
Opportunity and health care: Criticisms and suggestions.Lawrence Stern - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):339-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-25

Downloads
295 (#67,187)

6 months
34 (#100,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Voorhoeve
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references