Binding paradox in artificial social realities

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e48 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relation between communication partners is crucial for the success of their interaction. This is also true for artificial social agents. However, the more we engage in artificial relationships, the more we are forced to regulate and control them. I refer to this as binding paradox. This deserves attention during technological developments and requires professional supervision during ongoing interactions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artificial agents in social cognitive sciences.Thierry Chaminade & Jessica K. Hodgins - 2006 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 7 (3):347-353.
Asymmetry and adaptation in social interaction.Iris Nomikou, Karola Pitsch & Katharina J. Rohlfing - 2013 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 14 (2):vii-xii.
Improving the modeling of dog-owner interactions for the design of social robots.Monica Nicolescu - 2014 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 15 (2):180-183.
Learning where to look.Yasser F. O. Mohammad & Toyoaki Nishida - 2013 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 14 (3):419-450.
Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychological Benchmarks of Human–Robot Interaction.Karl F. MacDorman & Peter H. Kahn - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (3):359-362.
Introduction to the Special Issue on Gaze in Human-Robot Communication.Frank Broz, Hagen Lehmann, Bilge Mutlu & Yukiko Nakano - 2013 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 14 (3):vii-xv.
Introduction: Vocalize to Localize? A call for better crosstalk between auditory and visual communication systems researchers.Christian Abry, Anne Vilain & Jean-Luc Schwartz - 2005 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 5 (3):313-325.
Envisioning social robotics.Glenda Hannibal & Astrid Weiss - 2020 - Interaction Studies 21 (1):1-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-07

Downloads
8 (#1,308,042)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Real moral problems in the use of virtual reality.Erick Jose Ramirez & Scott LaBarge - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology (4):249-263.

Add more references