St. Anselm's ontological argument succumbs to Russell's paradox

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):123-128 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm and Russell.Maciej Nowicki - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368.
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chryssi Sidiropoulou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):131-152.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chryssi Sidiropoulou - 2009 - Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):131-152.
"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
Understanding Anselm's Ontological Argument.Guy Jackson - 2023 - Springer Nature Switzerland.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
115 (#153,074)

6 months
12 (#306,613)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Viger
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Anselm and Russell.Maciej Nowicki - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368.
The ontological argument and Russell's antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

Add more references