"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument

Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines interpretations of the doctrine that "exists" is not a predicate (existence is not a property). None, it is concluded, is both true and a refutation of St. Anselm's "ontological" argument for the existence of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"Exists" and St. Anselm's Argument.Philip E. Devine - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):59-70.
Reality and Existence in Anselm.Stephen Priest - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (4):461-462.
Reality and existence in Anselm.Stephen Priest - 2000 - Heythrop Journal 41 (4):461–462.
St. Anselm’s Argument.M. J. Charlesworth - 2019 - In Peter Wong, Sherah Bloor, Patrick Hutchings & Purushottama Bilimoria (eds.), Considering Religions, Rights and Bioethics: For Max Charlesworth. Springer Verlag. pp. 105-114.
Alvin Plantinga on the ontological argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Gaunilo's Cogito Argument.Miroslav Imbrisevic - 2007 - St. Anselm Journal:1-7.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
25 (#620,189)

6 months
2 (#1,445,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Devine
Providence College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references