The Role of Experience in the Critical Theory of Technology

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):47-71 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology features a sophisticated analysis of the ways by which social forces influence processes of technological design, production and use. While Feenberg is foremostly read as a critical theorist, this essay argues that his call to democratize technology stands on distinct phenomenological grounds. This is based on the way he illustrates the role of experience in subtending potentials for the progressive transformation of the sociotechnical sphere. Against this background, this essay identifies an important shift in the way Feenberg articulates experience, from relating it to lifelong processes of learning and identity-construction (Bildung) to an emphasis on visceral immediacy (Erlebnis). This shift manifests a newfound focus on material, embodied meanings over-against linguistic ones, and results in a considerable tension between Feenberg’s appeal to experiential self-evidence and his critical position toward technology. The discussion of the two modes of experience exemplifies the current that underlies Feenberg’s work, namely the creation of traffic between ontological and ontic accounts of sociotechnical entities, practices and relations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role of Experience in the Critical Theory of Technology.Roy Bendor - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):47-71.
Formal Bias and Normative Critique of Technology Design.Graeme Kirkpatrick - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):25-46.
Resistance Is Futile.Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2013 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 17 (1):72-92.
Comments on Andrew Feenberg’s Heidegger and Marcuse.Daniel Dahlstrom - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):52-61.
Comments on Andrew Feenberg’s Heidegger and Marcuse.Daniel Dahlstrom - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):52-61.
Interview with Andrew Feenberg.Laureano Ralon - 2010 - Figure/Ground Interview Series.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yoni Van Den Eede
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references