The dark matter double bind: Astrophysical aspects of the evidential warrant for general relativity

Philosophy of Science 70 (4):812-832 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dark matter problem in astrophysics exposes an underappreciated weakness in the evidential warrant for General Relativity (GR). The "dark matter double bind" entails that GR gets no differential evidential support from dynamical phenomena occurring at scales larger than our solar system, as compared to members of a significant class of rival gravitation theories. These rivals are each empirically indistinguishable from GR for phenomena taking place at solar system scales, but make predictions that may differ radically from GR's at larger scales. Thus the typical confidence in the universal applicability of GR is insufficiently warranted in the present evidential context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the interpretive role of theories of gravity and ‘ugly’ solutions to the total evidence for dark matter.William L. Vanderburgh - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:62-67.
General Relativity, MOND, and the problem of unconceived alternatives.Abhishek Kashyap - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-18.
Polarizable-Vacuum (PV) Approach to General Relativity.H. E. Puthoff - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (6):927-943.
Attractive and Repulsive Gravity.Philip D. Mannheim - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (5):709-746.
On the Explanation of Inertia.Adán Sus - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):293-315.
Theory Testing in Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics.Jamee Elder - 2023 - In Nora Mills Boyd, Siska De Baerdemaeker, Kevin Heng & Vera Matarese (eds.), Philosophy of Astrophysics: Stars, Simulations, and the Struggle to Determine What is Out There. Springer Verlag. pp. 2147483647-2147483647.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#75,834)

6 months
13 (#1,035,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lee Vanderburgh
California State University, San Bernardino

Citations of this work

Methodological reflections on the MOND/dark matter debate.Patrick M. Duerr & William J. Wolf - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):1-23.
On the interpretive role of theories of gravity and ‘ugly’ solutions to the total evidence for dark matter.William L. Vanderburgh - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:62-67.
Evidence of dark matter, and the interpretive role of general relativity.Peter Kosso - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (2):143-147.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Newton's concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion.I. Bernard Cohen - 2002 - In I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57--84.
Isaac Newton on empirical success and scientific method.William Harper - 1997 - In John Earman & John D. Norton (eds.), The Cosmos of Science: Essays of Exploration. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 55--86.

Add more references