Research into Rom. 8,4a: The legal claim of the law

Bijdragen 37 (3):252-269 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Originality.Mathias M. Siems - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):147-164.
Legal theory and sociological facts.M. Groot & O. M. - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (3):251-270.
Legal Theory and Sociological Facts.Muriel De Groot & Mirjan Oude Vrielink - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (3):251 - 270.
The autonomy of law: essays on legal positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research.Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.) - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law and Content-Independent Reasons.P. Markwick - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):579-596.
Text retrieval in the legal world.Howard Turtle - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (1-2):5-54.
Mapping Legal Semiotics.Anne Wagner - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (1):77-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
7 (#1,384,540)

6 months
2 (#1,192,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

An explanation of Rom. 8,4a.H. W. M. van de Sandt - 1976 - Bijdragen 37 (4):361-378.

Add more citations