Synthese 195 (2):491-510 (2018)
AbstractDespite their success in describing and predicting cognitive behavior, the plausibility of so-called ‘rational explanations’ is often contested on the grounds of computational intractability. Several cognitive scientists have argued that such intractability is an orthogonal pseudoproblem, however, since rational explanations account for the ‘why’ of cognition but are agnostic about the ‘how’. Their central premise is that humans do not actually perform the rational calculations posited by their models, but only act as if they do. Whether or not the problem of intractability is solved by recourse to ‘as if’ explanations critically depends, inter alia, on the semantics of the ‘as if’ connective. We examine the five most sensible explications in the literature, and conclude that none of them circumvents the problem. As a result, rational ‘as if’ explanations must obey the minimal computational constraint of tractability.
Similar books and articles
Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations.Iris Rooij, Cory Wright & Todd Wareham - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):471-487.
Bayesian Intractability Is Not an Ailment That Approximation Can Cure.Johan Kwisthout, Todd Wareham & Iris van Rooij - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (5):779-784.
Identifying sources of intractability in cognitive models: An illustration using analogical structure mapping.Iris van Rooij, Patricia Evans, Moritz Müller, Jason Gedge & Todd Wareham - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
Dispositions and Rational Explanation.Jason Bridges - 2011 - In Jason Bridges Niko Kolodny & Wai-Hung Wong (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding: Reflections on the Thought of Barry Stroud. Oxford University Press.
On Explaining Political Disagreement.Andrew Mason - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Rationality and the Social Sciences.James H. Moor - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:3 - 11.
How action understanding can be rational, Bayesian and tractable.Mark Blokpoel, Johan Kwisthout, T. P. van der Weide & Iris van Rooij - 2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
Aspects of the logic of history-of-science explanation.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1985 - Synthese 62 (3):429 - 454.
Understanding Rational Explanations: A Study of Four Characteristics of Rational Explanations and Their Implications for Contemporary Philosophy of Mind.Patsy Anthony Manfredi - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
The value of rational analysis: An assessment of causal reasoning and learning.S. A. Sloman & Philip M. Fernbach - 2008 - In Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.), The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 486--500.
The value of rational analysis: an assessment of causal reasoning and learning.Steven Sloman & Fernbach & M. Philip - 2008 - In Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.), The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
Situational logic and covering law explanations in history.Michael Martin - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):388 – 399.
Rational analysis as a link between human memory and information retrieval.Mark Steyvers & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2008 - In Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.), The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 329--349.
Rational analysis as a link between human memory and information retrieval.Mark Steyvers & Griffiths & L. Thomas - 2008 - In Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (eds.), The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.
Rationality Theory and the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Critique.Cassandra Lee Pinnick - 1993 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
First principles in the life sciences: the free-energy principle, organicism, and mechanism.Matteo Colombo & Cory Wright - 2021 - Synthese 198 (14):3463–3488.
Computational enactivism under the free energy principle.Tomasz Korbak - 2019 - Synthese 198 (3):2743-2763.
Demons of Ecological Rationality.Maria Otworowska, Mark Blokpoel, Marieke Sweers, Todd Wareham & Iris van Rooij - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (3):1057-1066.
How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation.Patricia Rich, Mark Blokpoel, Ronald Haan & Iris Rooij - 2020 - Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (4):1382-1402.
Schema-Centred Unity and Process-Centred Pluralism of the Predictive Mind.Nina Poth - 2022 - Minds and Machines 32 (3):433-459.
References found in this work
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality.William C. Wimsatt - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Piecewise Approximations to Reality.William C. Wimsatt - 2010 - Critica 42 (124):108-117.
Analyzing vision at the complexity level.John K. Tsotsos - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):423-445.
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):69-84.