Philosophy of biology: About the fossilization of disciplines and other embryonic thoughts

Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):47-71 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper focuses on a running dispute between Werner Callebaut’s naturalistic view and Filip Kolen and Gertrudis Van de Vijver’s transcendentalist view on the nature of philosophy of biology and the relation of this discipline to biological sciences. It is argued that, despite differences in opinion, both positions agree that philosophy of biology’s ultimate goal is to ‘move’ biology or at least be ‘meaningful’ to it. In order to make this goal clear and effective, more is needed than a polarizing debate which hardly touches upon biology. Therefore, a redirection in discussion is suggested towards a reflection on the possibilities of incorporating philosophy in interdisciplinary research, and on finding concrete research questions which are of interest both to the philosopher and to the biologist.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Transcendental niche construction.Werner Callebaut - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):73-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Nicomachean ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 2014 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.. Edited by C. D. C. Reeve.
Philosophy of biological science.David L. Hull - 1974 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition.Ernest Sosa - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):99-107.
Organisers and Genes.C. H. Waddington - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (3):463-463.

View all 30 references / Add more references