On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago
Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6) (2009)
Abstract
This article discusses new material, published in volume 12 of the Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, that addresses Einstein’s knowledge of the Michelson–Morley experiment prior to 1905: in a lecture in Chicago in 1921, Einstein referred to the experiment, mentioned when he came upon it and hinted at its influence. Arguments are presented to explain the contrast with Einstein’s later pronouncements on the role of the experiment.DOI
10.1007/s00407-009-0050-5
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Historiography of Special Relativity: Comments on the Papers by John Earman, Clark Glymour, and Robert Rynasiewicz and by Arthur Miller.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:417 - 428.
Einstein's discovery of special relativity.Gary Gutting - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (1):51-68.
Independent testability: The Michelson-Morley and Kennedy-Thorndike experiments.Ronald Laymon - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (1):1-37.
Emil Rupp, Albert Einstein and the canal Ray experiments on wave-particle duality: Scientific fraud and theoretical bias.Jeroen van Dongen - unknown
Reconsidering Experiments.Lydia Patton - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):209-226.
The origins of length contraction: I. The Fitzgerald-lorentz deformation hypothesis.Harvey R. Brown - 2001 - American Journal of Physics 69:1044-1054.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-07-28
Downloads
61 (#196,648)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
2009-07-28
Downloads
61 (#196,648)
6 months
1 (#448,894)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Einstein's reinterpretation of the Fizeau experiment: How it turned out to be crucial for special relativity.Alejandro Cassini & Marcelo Leonardo Levinas - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 65 (C):55-72.
Transformational Fallibilism and the Development of Understanding.Stephen Kemp - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (2):192-209.
Can we trust Einstein’s accounts of the genesis of special relativity?Olivier Darrigol - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):138-154.