Historical Explanation and Comparative Method: Towards a Theory of the History of Society

History and Theory 28 (1):1-24 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the relevance of an analytical philosophy of history to the practice of history? There are four fundamental criticisms of the existing analytical philosophy: analytical philosophers have concentrated on old, dualistic traditions of history; they have not provided sufficient empirical validation for their explanatory theories; they have paid little attention to the preliminary operations necessary to the writing of historical explanation; and they have ignored important stages of growth within the study of history. These are criticisms of the existing apragmatic philosophies of history, which lack a necessary empirical basis and become static, tied to one research tradition within historical scholarship. A pragmatic philosophy of history would focus on the growth of historical scholarship. The "History of Society," a name for the global approach to history, operates under the rules of comparative history. In the framework of a typology of the comparative method, types of difference and contrast refer back to the dominating types of macrocausality, generality, and inclusion. The logic of historical explanations is greatly determined by the choice of a particular type of comparative history. A pragmatic analysis demonstrates that a plurality of shades of meaning are possible in historical explanation, and that the traditional apragmatic dualist theory of a tension between the global and particular provides insufficient description

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The interrogative model: Historical inquiry and explanation.Eric Brook - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (2):137-159.
Functional explanation, consequence explanation, and marxism.G. A. Cohen - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):27 – 56.
Explanation and theory evaluation.Adam Grobler & Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):299-310.
Explication, explanation, and history.Carl Hammer - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (2):183–199.
Varieties and vagaries of historical explanation.Paul A. Roth - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):214-226.
Useful Durkheim.Mustafa Emirbayer - 1996 - Sociological Theory 14 (2):109-130.
Explaining large-scale historical change.Daniel Little - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):89-112.
The logic of the situation.James J. Leach - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (3):258-273.
Society, globalization and the comparative method.Roland Axtmann - 1993 - History of the Human Sciences 6 (2):53-74.
Empathy, Rationality, and Explanation.Mark Bevir & Karsten Stueber - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):147-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
24 (#563,024)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Artemis Den
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Citations of this work

Comparative History of Science.Lewis Pyenson - 2002 - History of Science 40 (1):1-33.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references