Both Random and Guided

Ratio 28 (3):332-348 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues, first, that biological evolution can be both random and divinely guided at the same time. Next it discusses the idea that the claim that evolution is unguided is not part of the science of evolution, and defends it against a number of objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-18

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

René Van Woudenberg
VU University Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Design Hypotheses Behave Like Skeptical Hypotheses.René van Woudenberg & Jeroen de Ridder - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (2):69-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Warranted Christian Belief.P. Helm - 2001 - Mind 110 (440):1110-1115.
Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience.[author unknown] - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (2):117-124.
Evolution without naturalism.Elliott Sober - 2013 - In L. Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 187-221.
Evolutionary Chance Mutation: A Defense of the Modern Synthesis' Consensus View.Francesca Merlin - 2010 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 2 (20130604).
Toward a New Philosophy of Biology.David Edward Shaner - 1990 - Philosophy East and West 40 (2):264-266.

View all 12 references / Add more references