Miller's Perspectives on Deconstructive Angel

Abstract

The deconstructive angel has been with us for a while, long enough for us to want to start evaluating its impact on us. M.H. Abrams first used the phrase “deconstructive angel”, He has analysed it with bad metaphysics, but it has not been successful. More than two decades have passed with American critics wrestling mightily with deconstructive angel, and many have succumbed to its charm. This paper analyses the deconstructive angel from Miller’s point of view. Miller applied deconstructive angel analysis to various metaphysical things such as pronouncement, mise en abyme, ideological material, reading and misreading.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

To and from Derrida's Sediment and Spirit of Signs. [REVIEW]Apple Igrek - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):133-142.
Deliberative democracy and provisionality.Lasse Thomassen - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):423-443.
The Deconstructive Angel.M. H. Abrams - 1977 - Critical Inquiry 3 (3):425-438.
The Rhetoric of Jacques Derrida II: Phaedrus.Yoav Rinon - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (3):537 - 558.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-16

Downloads
5 (#1,541,296)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references