Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography

&
Nursing Inquiry 10 (4):245-256 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00190.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Breast cancer screening in younger women: evidence and decision making.J. Mark Elwood - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (3):179-186.
Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.Eric Chamot, Agathe Charvet & Thomas V. Perneger - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (4):620-625.
Optimal two‐stage breast cancer screening for countries with intermediate or low incidence of breast cancer.Shou-Jen Kuo, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Dar-Ren Chen & Li-Sheng Chen - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1345-1352.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: the social and cultural context of genetic testing for breast cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening.R. G. Jepson - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):192-196.
Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean?Ann Johnson & Jane Shekhdar - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (1):27-31.
“It is about our body, our own body!”: On the difficulty of telling dutch women under 50 that mammography is not for them.Peter J. Schulz & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):130-142.
The medical decision-making process and the family: The case of breast cancer patients and their husbands.Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons from the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands. [REVIEW]Marianne Boenink - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (1):84-102.
Patient, physician and presentational influences on clinical decision making for breast cancer: results from a factorial experiment.John B. McKinlay, Risa B. Burns, Richard Durante, Henry A. Feldman, Karen M. Freund, Brooke S. Harrow, Julie T. Irish, Linda E. Kasten & Mark A. Moskowitz - 1997 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3 (1):23-57.
Risk, uncertainty, and rational action.Carlo Jaeger (ed.) - 2001 - London: Earthscan.
Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms.K. J. Jorgensen, J. Brodersen, O. J. Hartling, M. Nielsen & P. C. Gotzsche - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (4):268-269.
Interactive patient decision aids for women facing genetic testing for familial breast cancer: a systematic web and literature review.Lisa Williams, Wendy Jones, Glyn Elwyn & Adrian Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (1):70-74.
How would a latent period for early breast cancer affect the benefit of screening?Leslie E. Blumenson - 1987 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2):169-182.
REVIEW: Robert A. Aronowitz. Unnatural History: Breast Cancer and American Society. [REVIEW]Joelle M. Abi-Rached - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):79-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
21 (#731,064)

6 months
7 (#418,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard J. Savage - 1954 - Synthese 11 (1):86-89.

View all 10 references / Add more references