Good Revolutions Gone Bad

Philosophy Today 59 (3):475-505 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Martin Heidegger and Slavoj Žižek represent the two major anti-liberal European revolutions of the twentieth century, the Nazi and the October revolutions. Both revolutions ended badly, but neither Heidegger nor Žižek retreats from the revolutionary position, simply because it is an indelible part of their philosophy, where the finitude of the world and human being necessitate a partisan truth. By reintroducing the concept of the subject, Žižek wants to present a correction that cures Heidegger’s politics. Unfortunately, the resurrection relies on a sleight of hand: the subject to be reintroduced tries to be at the same time ahistorical and leftist. Žižek finds in Heidegger’s reading of Anaximander signs of ahistorical subjectivity, but this interpretation is based on a misconstrual of Heidegger’s notion of alêtheia. On the other hand, by analysing Heidegger’s two famous passages mentioning the extermination camps, we find the factual blind-spots in Heidegger’s ontological gaze.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Investigating the Place of Language in Heidegger’s Ready-to-hand Ontological Horizon.Seyyed Jamal Same & Mohammad Javad Safian - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 10 (19):173-205.
Heidegger's Spectral Abyss in the Žižek & Harman Duel/Duet.Jan Gresil Kahambing - 2022 - Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 18 (1):302-330.
Heidegger and the Subject.François Raffoul - 1998 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanity Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-13

Downloads
22 (#697,556)

6 months
3 (#1,206,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references